Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On 5/7/15 9:44 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> a) make sure we don't lose track of bug-fix patches
>> b) make it clear where bug-fix patches should be submitted
>> c) provide a view of bug-fix patches for people to look at outside of
>> CF time
>> d) continue to have a single view which includes all active patches
>> with bug fixes listed first
> I think these goals are valid, but are adequately served by the current
> setup.
Not sure I agree with that ...
> I think having a separate bucket for bugs would just lead to lots of
> discussions over what qualifies as a bug.
... but I do agree with this. With our current methodology there's
not a lot of need to decide a-priori whether something is a feature
or a bug (in particular, the way it's categorized in the CF app is
not a high-stakes decision). I think that's just as well.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
