On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > I don't see a problem at all, with one exception: If we want the AS to > be optional like in a bunch of other places, we have to either promote > VALUES to a reserved keyword, only accept unreserved keywords, or play > precedence games. I think it'd be perfectly fine to not make AS > optional.
+1. In any case, we can't very well not support having any alias on the target. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
