On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.m...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Attached v10 patch is latest version patch.
>>> The syntax is,
>>> REINDEX { INDEX | ... } name [ WITH ] [ VERBOSE ]
>>>
>>> That is, WITH clause is optional.
>>
>> I thought we agreed on moving this earlier in the command:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18569.1423159...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>
>
> Oh, I see.
> Attached patch is modified syntax as
> REINDEX [VERBOSE] { INDEX | ... } name
>
> Thought?
I thought what we agreed on was:
REINDEX (flexible options) { INDEX | ... } name
The argument wasn't about whether to use flexible options, but where
in the command to put them.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
