On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Very sorry for the trash.. > > === > Now I found a comment at just where I patched, > > > * XXX if the typinput function is not immutable, we really ought to > > * postpone evaluation of the function call until runtime. But there > > * is no way to represent a typinput function call as an expression > > * tree, because C-string values are not Datums. (XXX This *is* > > * possible as of 7.3, do we want to do it?) > > - Is it OK to *now* we can do this? > + Is it OK to regard that we can do this *now*? > > In this patch or a different one? Does this comment have anything to do with the concern of this thread? David J.
