Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> ... btw, has anyone noticed that this patch broke hamerkop and
> Tom> bowerbird? Or at least, it's hard to see what other recent commit
> Tom> would explain the failures they're showing.
> Now that Robert committed the fix for 64bit Datum w/o USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL,
> bowerbird seems fixed (hamerkop hasn't run yet).
> I see nothing in the win32 stuff that tries to define USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL
> on 64-bit windows, is this just an oversight or does it not actually
> work there? or is it for on-disk compatibility with 32-bit windows?
That flag doesn't affect on-disk compatibility. It could certainly break
third-party extensions, but we accept the same hazard on non-Windows with
equanimity. I suspect this point simply wasn't revisited when we added
support for 64-bit Windows.
Having said that, I'm fine with leaving this as-is, if only because
it means we're exercising the --disable-float8-byval code paths in
the buildfarm ;-)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
