On March 24, 2015 12:35:28 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote:
>> I was attempting to set up a data set to test pg_rewind, when I
>encountered
>> an error. I created a primary and standby, then:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> # insert into utest (thing) values ('moomoo');
>> ERROR: index "utest_pkey" contains unexpected zero page at block 0
>> HINT: Please REINDEX it.
>>
>> This is built on commit e5f455f59fed0632371cddacddd79895b148dc07.
>
>Unlogged tables are not in WAL, and cannot be accessed while in
>recovery, so having an empty index relation is expected on a promoted
>standby IMO. Now perhaps we could have a more friendly error message
>in _bt_checkpage(), _hash_checkpage() and gistcheckpage() with an
>additional HINT to mention unlogged tables, but I am not sure that
>this is much worth it. Mentioning this behavior in the docs would be
>good instead.
I think Thom's point is that he promoted the node...
Thom, are you sure this want transient?
Andres
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
