On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Seriously? In my opinion it has to be possible to doubt whether a patch >> should be committed in certain release without it being interpreted as a >> personal attack. > > I don't think anyone's said anything in this thread that amounts to a > personal attack. We have a difference of opinion on policy, and what > I'm saying is that the policy ultimately reduces to trusting individual > committers to use their best judgment. If someone's going to tell me > that my judgment about when to push something is not acceptable, then > they probably ought to be calling for removal of my commit privileges.
Neither I nor anyone else is prepared to do that on the basis of what happens to this one patch. But if we adopt a project policy that says a committer can ignore the contrary opinions of other people, even when those other people include multiple other committers, this project will not, in the long term, be successful. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
