Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Is there a reason not to make a rule that opclass members must be > parallel-safe? I ask because I think it's important that the process > of planning a query be categorically parallel-safe.
I'm not seeing the connection between those two statements. The planner doesn't usually execute opclass members, at least not as such. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers