Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Is there a reason not to make a rule that opclass members must be
> parallel-safe?  I ask because I think it's important that the process
> of planning a query be categorically parallel-safe.

I'm not seeing the connection between those two statements.  The planner
doesn't usually execute opclass members, at least not as such.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to