On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 08:19:39PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> So I am planning to seriously focus soon on this stuff, basically >> using the TAP tests as base infrastructure for this regression test >> suite. First, does using the TAP tests sound fine? > > Yes.
Check. >> On the top of my mind I got the following items that should be tested: >> - WAL replay: from archive, from stream >> - hot standby and read-only queries >> - node promotion >> - recovery targets and their interferences when multiple targets are >> specified (XID, name, timestamp, immediate) >> - timelines >> - recovery_target_action >> - recovery_min_apply_delay (check that WAL is fetch from a source at >> some correct interval, can use a special restore_command for that) >> - archive_cleanup_command (check that command is kicked at each restart >> point) >> - recovery_end_command (check that command is kicked at the end of recovery) >> - timeline jump of a standby after reconnecting to a promoted node > > Those sound good. The TAP suites still lack support for any Windows target. > If you're inclined to fix that, it would be a great contribution. The more we > accrue tests before doing that, the harder it will be to dig out. Yeah, that's already on my TODO list. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
