On 03/09/2015 09:29 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
From the reading the original post it seems like the patch was developed on
Sales Force's time, not TGLs. I do not think we get to have an opinion on
that.
Salesforce gets to develop their patches whenever they want, but they
don't get to control the community process for getting those patches
committed to PostgreSQL.
Did I miss the part of the post that said, (speaking as Tom): FYI, I am
ignoring the commit fest deadline and committing this?
Are we supposed to hold patches when we are post-deadline and not seek
feedback? That seems rather hostile.
Thank you Tom for the efforts you made here, making the largest used PL
better, faster, stronger is exactly the type of micro-changes we need to be
looking at for further polish within the database.
So, just to be clear, are you proposing that everybody is exempted
from the CommitFest deadlines, or just Tom?
I am not suggesting that anyone is exempted from a CommitFest deadline.
I am actually rather hard line that we should be keeping them.
I think it is ridiculous to post on the bad/good/timing of a patch
submission unless there is a case being made that the process isn't
actually being followed. I don't see that here.
In short, soap boxing does nobody any good.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc
Now I get it: your service is designed for a customer
base that grew up with Facebook, watches Japanese seizure
robot anime, and has the attention span of a gnat.
I'm not that user., "Tyler Riddle"
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
