On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:55:44PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 02/26/2015 01:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > This patch decouples these three things so that they > > can changed freely -- but provides no user interface to do so. I think > > that trying to only decouple the thing we currently have in two pieces, > > and then have a subsequent patch to decouple again, is additional > > conceptual complexity for no gain. > > Oh, I didn't realize there weren't commands to change the LCO. Without > at least SQL syntax for LCO, I don't see why we'd take it; this sounds > more like a WIP patch.
FYI, pg_upgrade is going to need pg_dump --binary-upgrade to output the columns in physical order with some logical ordering information, i.e. pg_upgrade cannot be passed only logical ordering from pg_dump. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
