On 3/2/15 3:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-03-02 16:42:35 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>  wrote:
> >Two reasons this isn't terribly compelling are (1) it's creating a
> >join in a place where the planner can't possibly see it and optimize
> >it, and (2) you risk MVCC anomalies because the reg* output routines
> >would not be using the same snapshot as the calling query.
> >
> >We already have problem (2) with the existing reg* functions so I'm
> >not that excited about doubling down on the concept.
>
>I think I agree.  I mean, I agree that this notation is more
>convenient, but I don't really want to add a whole new slough of types
>--- these will certainly not be the only ones we want once we go down
>this path --- to the default install just for notational convenience.
>It's arguable, of course, but I guess I'm going to vote against this
>patch.
That's a justifyable position. I don't think there are other catalogs
referenced as pervasively in the catalog though.

There's one additional point: Using reg* types in the catalog tables
themselves can make them*much*  easier to read. I personally do look at
the catalogs a awful lot, and seing names instead of oids makes it much
easier. And adding regtype/role would allow to cover nearly all types
containing oids.

+1. Constantly joining catalog tables together is a royal PITA, and regnamespace is the biggest missing part of this (I typically don't look at roles too much, but I can certainly see it's importance).

If we had more user friendly views on the catalogs maybe this wouldn't be an issue... but that's a much larger project.

BTW, I think the potential for MVCC issues should be mentioned in the docs (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype-oid.html).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to