On 2015-02-26 12:15:17 +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > On 26-02-2015 AM 05:15, Josh Berkus wrote: > > On 02/24/2015 12:13 AM, Amit Langote wrote: > >> Here is an experimental patch that attempts to implement this.
> > I would love to have it for 9.5, but I guess the > > patch isn't nearly baked enough for that? > I'm not quite sure what would qualify as baked enough for 9.5 though we > can surely try to reach some consensus on various implementation aspects > and perhaps even get it ready in time for 9.5. I think it's absolutely unrealistic to get this into 9.5. There's barely been any progress on the current (last!) commitfest - where on earth should the energy come to make this patch ready? And why would that be fair against all the others that have submitted in time? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
