On 2/19/15 4:33 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 02/19/2015 12:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 1/6/15 4:22 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> That said, there is a much simpler way to achieve that specific >>> functionality: Expose all the recovery settings as fake read-only GUC >>> variables. See attached patch for an example. >> >> The commit fest app has this as the patch of record. I don't think >> there is a real updated patch under consideration here. This item >> should probably not be in the commit fest at all. > > What happened to the original patch? Regardless of what we do, keeping > recovery.conf the way it is can't be what we go forward with.
There was disagreement on many of the details, and no subsequent new proposal. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
