> > Now, we probably don't want to hack *all* the utility commands to return > > ObjectAddress instead of OID, because it many cases that's just not > > going to be convenient (not to speak of the code churn); so I think for > > most objtypes the ProcessUtilitySlow stanza would look like this:
> That'd be fine with me, though for my 2c, I wouldn't object to changing > them all to return ObjectAddress either. I agree that it'd cause a fair > bit of code churn to do so, but there's a fair bit of code churn > happening here anyway (looking at what 0008 does to ProcessUtilitySlow > anyway). Well, that would make my life easier I think (even if it's a bit more work), so unless there are objections I will do things this way. It's a bit of a pity that Robert and Dimitri went to huge lengths to have these functions return OID and we're now changing it all to ObjAddress instead, but oh well. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
