Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE

[Jim Nasby]

On 2/3/15 9:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>i.g., I will add following syntax format,
>REINDEX ( { INDEX | TABLE | SCHEMA | SYSTEM | DATABASE } , [VERBOSE] )
>name [FORCE];
Well, the object type is not an optional part of the command.  It's
*necessary*.  I was thinking more like
REINDEX { INDEX | TABLE | etc } name [ ( option [, option ...] ) ]

VACUUM puts the options before the table name, so ISTM it'd be best to 
keep that with REINDEX. Either REINDEX (options) {INDEX | ...} or 
REINDEX {INDEX | ...} (options).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers