On 01/28/2015 02:28 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 01/28/2015 02:10 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> So 390MB were transferred out of a possible 474MB. That certainly seems >> like we're still transferring the majority of the data, even though I >> verified that the hard links are being sent as hard links. No? > > Looks like the majority of that was pg_xlog. Going to tear this down > and start over, and --exclude pg_xlog. >
So, having redone this without the pg_xlog lag, this appears to work in terms of cutting down the rsync volume. I'm concerned about putting this in the main docs, though. This is a complex, and fragile procedure, which is very easy to get wrong, and hard to explain for a generic case. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
