On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That's what I hope to find out. :-) > Buildfarm seems happy now. I just gave a try to that on one of my > small Windows VMs and compared the performance with 9.4 for this > simple test case when building with MSVC 2010: > create table aa as select random()::text as a, 'filler filler filler' > as b a from generate_series(1,1000000); > create index aai in aa(a): > On 9.4, the index creation took 26.5s, while on master it took 18s. > That's nice, particularly for things like a restore from a dump.
Cool. That's a little bit smaller win than I would have expected given my Linux results, but it's certainly respectable. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
