On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: >> Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just >> committed, and fixing those bugs. > So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?
Well, I still like using the existing ResourceOwner pointers to find the snapshots more than introducing a separate data structure just for that. But I'm OK with Heikki committing his version and, if anybody notices the new code becoming a hotspot, we can revisit the issue. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
