On 01/08/2015 12:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> > c) Infrastructure for changing settings effective during recovery. Right >> > now we'd have to rebuild a lot of guc infrasturcture to allow >> > that. It'd not be that hard to allow changing parameters like >> > restore_command, primary_conninfo, recovery_target_* et al. That's >> > for sure not the same commit, but once the infrastructure is in those >> > won't be too hard. > Right, if that worked, then it would be a real win. But this discussion > is about right now, and the perspective of the user.
That's rather a catch-22, isn't it? Last I checked, it was our policy to try to get smaller, more discrete patches rather than patches which try to change everything at once. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
