On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Alexey Vasiliev <leopard...@inbox.ru> wrote: >> To not modify current pg_usleep calculation, I changed >> restore_command_retry_interval value to seconds (not milliseconds). In this >> case, min value - 1 second. > Er, what the problem with not changing 1000000L to 1000L? The unit of > your parameter is ms AFAIK. Of course I meant in the previous version of the patch not the current one. Wouldn't it be useful to use it with for example retry intervals of the order of 100ms~300ms for some cases? -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
