On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 06:26:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > >> Plan C (remove CATUPDATE altogether) also has some merit. But adding a > >> superuser override there would be entirely pointless. > > > This is be my recommendation. I do not see the point of carrying the > > option around just to confuse new users of pg_authid and reviewers of > > the code. > > Yeah ... if no one's found it interesting in the 20 years since the > code left Berkeley, it's unlikely that interest will emerge in the > future.
No objection here. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
