All, It's sounding like folks would prefer keeing the master contributors list up to date, to adding a bunch of names to the release notes.
So, then, I have a proposal for criteria for getting on the contributors list via patch review: - substantial, deep review of at least one patch (including detailed code review and possible corrections) - "functionality" reviews of at least 3 patches, including full write-ups (not just "it compiled, seems to work"). Kibitz as you may, but please don't try to make these criteria more *complicated*, because there's no way we'll ever keep track. Note that updating the contributor list in the past has been slow due to lack of technology and process; if it's our way forward, then I'll apply myself to that problem. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
