* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > So my two cents is that when considering a qualified name, this patch > should take levenshtein distance across the two components equally. > There's no good reason to suppose that typos will attack one name > component more (nor less) than the other.
Agreed (since it seems like folks are curious for the opinion's of mostly bystanders). +1 to the above for my part. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature