On 15 December 2014 at 19:52, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 12/15/2014 11:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I feel like we used to be better at encouraging people to participate >> in the CF even if they were not experts, and to do the best they can >> based on what they did know. That was a helpful dynamic. Sure, the >> reviews weren't perfect, but more people helped, and reviewing some of >> the patch well and some of it in a more cursory manner is way better >> than reviewing none of it at all. > > Well, it was strongly expressed to me by a number of senior contributors > on this list and at the developer meeting that inexpert reviews were not > really wanted, needed or helpful. As such, I stopped recruiting new > reviewers (and, for that matter, doing them myself). I don't know if > the same goes for anyone else.
I don't remember saying that, hearing it or agreeing with it and I don't agree with it now. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
