Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If we are going to go for a beta6, I vote we reverse out the patch. Of > > course, I prefer neither. > > I read this several times and am still not quite sure which path you are > voting for. We can: > > 1. not apply the patch to fix Ross' problem, and ship RC1 tomorrow; > 2. apply the patch, and ship RC1 tomorrow; > 3. apply the patch and delay RC1. > > Which do you like? > > Personally I think this is a low-risk patch and so choice 2 is > appropriate.
Sorry, I was vague. I think we should apply and go to RC1 tomorrow. There will always be tweaks and fixes. If we expect it to be perfect, we will never make a final release. We are 2.5 months into beta, and if we don't want +3 months beta, we should get going. We have to start taking some _reasonable_ risks to move this forward. Until we make a final, we will not increase our test pool, and at this point we are all sort of staring at each other. Let's go! -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
