On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:13:56PM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:53:00PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Tom Lane writes: > > > > > We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may > > > not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list > > > seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke > > > those ... > > > > Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD. > > That is highly suspicious, and I would not venture a guess about how > > likely it is they're broken.
PostgreSQL 7.3b1 on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6H, compiled by GCC 2.95.3 PostgreSQL 7.4devel on i386-unknown-netbsdelf1.6K, compiled by GCC 2.95.3 I in fact get geometry.out rather than geometry-positive-zeros.out, but I think you get the former when you use libm387.so.0 instead of libm.so.0 which isn't exactly the general case for NetBSD, though I have only one NetBSD/i386 box which can't make use of libm387 (it's a 486SX25) The 7.4devel was with source from Nov 9 12:27 GMT, so I think rather close to 7.3, and again with source from just now. Cheers, Patrick ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
