Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane writes: > >> We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may > >> not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list > >> seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke > >> those ... > > > Note that we have *zero* reports for any flavor of NetBSD and OpenBSD. > > Maybe they're both dead platforms? ;-) > > Seriously, I agree with Marc's opinion that issuing an RC1 is the best > way to flush out some more port reports. I do not know what else we can > do to get people off their duffs and onto last-minute testing. > > > (Maybe you could get someone from Red Hat to confirm the remaining Linux > > ports?) > > Anyone care about the PlayStation 2 port ;=) ? I can get Permaine to > retest if so. Slightly more seriously, we did see a recent report of > trouble on S/390 Linux, but the complainant didn't follow up...
I put an S/390 patch into current CVS --- too risky for 7.3 because it played with the Power PC ASM instructions. I think we can assume that port will not work for 7.3. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
