Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> what do you want to do about this? In the back branches, exposing a
> function like this would be an API change, wouldn't it? Perhaps there we
> just need to pick up the 100 lines or so involved from json.c and copy
> them into hstore_io.c, suitably modified. In the development branch I
> thing adding the function to the API is the best way.
If we're going to do it by calling some newly-exposed function, I'd be
inclined to fix it the same way in the back branches. Otherwise the
discrepancy between the branches is a big back-patching hazard.
(For instance, if we realize we need to fix a bug in the numeric-parsing
code, what are the odds that we remember to fix hstore's additional copy
in the back branches?)
The "API break" isn't a big issue imo. The net effect would be that eg
hstore 9.3.6 wouldn't work against a 9.3.5 server. We do that sort of
thing *all the time* --- at least twice in the past year, according to
a quick scan of the commit logs. If you were changing or removing a
function that third-party code might depend on, it'd be problematic,
but an addition has no such risk.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
