On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote: > I'm pretty puzzled by this. Other than our "agree to disagree and > defer to committer" position on the question of whether or not more > than one suggestion can come from a single RTE, which you were fine > with before [1], I have only restored the core/contrib separation to a > state recently suggested by Robert as the best and simplest all around > [2]. > Did I miss something else? My point is: I am not sure I can be defined as a reviewer of this patch or take any credit in this patch review knowing that the latest version submitted is a simple rebase of the version I did my first review on. Hence, code speaking, this patch is in the same state as when it has been firstly submitted. Thanks, -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
