On 03/11/14 22:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 11/1/14 8:04 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On second thought, maybe those should be pg_get_transaction_committs,
pg_get_transaction_committs_data, etc.
Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of
something.
There is nothing wrong with
pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp()
If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get".
I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only
concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
