On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't know if/when that will happen as such, but Simon was making noises > about writing code to treat hash indexes as unlogged automatically, which > would more or less fix the worst risks. That's not just a special case > for hash indexes, but any index AM that lacks WAL support, as third-party > AMs might well do. > As someone writing a 3rd-party AM, literally right this moment, do you have a link to that thread? While I follow this list fairly closely I don't remember seeing this. I'd love to understand the thoughts around handling extension-based AMs. eric
