* Nicolas Barbier (nicolas.barb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2014-10-16 Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net>:
> 
> > Alright, coming back to this, I have to ask- how are matviews different
> > from views from the SQL standard's perspective?
> 
> Matviews that are always up to date when you access them are
> semantically exactly the same as normal views. Matviews that can get
> out of date, however, are not.

And when we have matviews which can be kept up to date..?

        Thanks,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to