Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whilst having a regular 4-6 month cycle (er... when was the last time
> THAT happened?) is alright, we should get the *Windows* native version
> out to the world ASAP.
We don't have a Windows native version, and it sounds like it'll be
awhile before we have an offered set of patches to review. I think
making any release schedule plans on the basis of (ahem) vaporware
patches is a bit foolhardy.
The "quick 7.4" plan was based on the assumption that PITR and Windows
patches would both be available almost immediately. If that doesn't
come to pass then I see no reason not to go with a normal-length
development cycle.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
