On 10/02/2014 05:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
OK.
Given that the results look good, do you plan to push this?
By "this", you mean the increase in the number of buffer mapping
partitions to 128, and a corresponding increase in MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS?
Hmm, do we actually ever need to hold all the buffer partition locks at
the same time? At a quick search for NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS in the code,
I couldn't find any place where we'd do that. I bumped up
NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS to 128, but left MAX_SIMUL_LWLOCKS at 100, and did
"make check". It passed.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
