The output would look something like this (modified from the manual's example
by hand, so the numbers don't add up):
0 199 2241 0 1175850568 995598 1020
0 200 2465 0 1175850568 998079 1010
0 201 skipped 1175850569 608 3011
0 202 skipped 1175850569 608 2400
0 203 skipped 1175850569 608 1000
0 204 2513 0 1175850569 608 500
0 205 2038 0 1175850569 2663 500
My 0.02€: ISTM that the number of columns should stay the same whether it
is skipped or not, so the "file_no" should be kept. Maybe to keep it a
number would make sense (-1) or just a sign (-) which means "no value"
with gnuplot for instance. Or "skipped".
Basically I would be fine with that, but as I do not use the log file
feature I'm not sure that my opinion should count.
Note that there are also potential issues with the aggregate logging and
the sampling stuff.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
