On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-09-11 12:55:21 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > I advise supporting pglz only for the initial patch, and adding > > support for the others later if it seems worthwhile. The approach > > seems to work well enough with pglz that it's worth doing even if we > > never add the other algorithms. > > That approach is fine with me. Note though that I am pretty strongly > against adding support for more than one algorithm at the same time. So, > if we gain lz4 support - which I think is definitely where we should go > - we should drop pglz support for the WAL. > > Greetings, > > Andres Freund >
+1 Regards, Ken -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
