On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Client Count/Patch_Ver (tps) 8 16 32 64 128 > HEAD 58614 107370 140717 104357 65010 > Patch 60092 113564 165014 213848 216065 > > This data is median of 3 runs, detailed report is attached with mail. > I have not repeated the test for all configurations, as there is no > major change in design/algorithm which can effect performance. > Mark has already taken tpc-b data which ensures that there is > no problem with it, however I will also take it once with latest version.
Well, these numbers are pretty much amazing. Question: It seems there's obviously quite a bit of contention left; do you think there's still a significant amount of time in the clock sweep, or is the primary bottleneck the buffer mapping locks? merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
