On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 02:22:12PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/19/2014 01:37 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > >pg_isready has --username: > > > > -U, --username=USERNAME user name to connect as > > > > > >so is replying when given a non-existent user not a bug? > > > >pg_isready --username=xxxx -p 6544 > >/tmp:6544 - accepting connections > > > >There is no user xxxx. (PG envvars are removed) > > Per the manual page on pg_isready: > > >The options --dbname and --username can be used to avoid gratuitous > >error messages in the logs, but are not necessary for proper > >functionality. > > The libpq entry on PQpingParams(), which pg_isready uses, has a bit > more details: > > >It is not necessary to supply correct user name, password, or > >database name values to obtain the server status; however, if > >incorrect values are provided, the server will log a failed > >connection attempt. > > BTW, I find the above PQpingParams() explanation much more clear > than one in pg_isready. I think we should use the same text in both > places.
Done. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
