2014-09-04 15:38 GMT+02:00 Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.info>: > On 09/04/2014 09:31 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> 2014-09-04 15:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Wieck <j...@wi3ck.info >> >> I think I like the COMMAND CONSTRAINT the best so far. >> >> >> I not, because when it will not be part of SQL, than parser in plpgsql >> will be more complex. You have to inject SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE >> > > Making the COMMAND CONSTRAINT part of the core SQL parser was how I > understood Hannu's idea. It would be horrible to tuck that feature away > inside of a PL, rather than making it available to all PLs as well as > applications, that use SQL directly (I think there still are two or three > applications that do).
So I am happy so we have agreement, so implementation on PL level can be terrible. Pavel > > > > Regards, > Jan > > -- > Jan Wieck > Senior Software Engineer > http://slony.info >
