On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > SINGLETON UPDATE ...? > >> > >> Does it come with built-in spell check? :-) It's a bit long to write. > >> I like STRICT, that maps good to what we already have with SELECT ... > >> INTO STRICT. > > > > Spell checker coming in plpgsql3! ;-) > > > > Anyway, as you have seen, the problem is not creating plpgsql2 --- you > > could do that yourself on your own and distribute it. What you want is > > for the community to develop/maintain it, and as you have also seen, > > everyone uses plpgsql slightly differently, so if you want the community > > to maintain it, you are only going to get some of the things you want. > > Very true, I totally agree. > > But what do you think about, > STRICT UPDATE ...?
Seems fine to me. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
