Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2013-11-15 10:43:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Another reason I'm not in a hurry is that the problem we're trying > >> to solve doesn't seem to be causing real-world trouble. So by > >> "awhile", I'm thinking "let's let it get through 9.4 beta testing". > > > Well, there have been a bunch of customer complaints about it, afair > > that's what made Alvaro look into it in the first place. So it's not a > > victimless bug. > > OK, then maybe end-of-beta is too long. But how much testing will it get > during development? I know I never use SSL on development installs. > How many hackers do?
Just a reminder that I intend to backpatch this (and subsequent fixes). We've gone over two 9.4 betas now. Maybe it'd be a good thing if the beta3 announcement carried a note about enabling SSL with a low ssl_renegotiation_limit setting. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
