On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:11:46AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello > > <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> Well, it's fairly harmless, but it might not be a bad idea to tighten that > >>> up. > >> The attached patch tighten that up. > > Hm... It might be interesting to include it in 9.4 IMO, somewhat > > grouping with what has been done in a6542a4 for SET and ABORT. > > Meh. There will always be another thing we could squeeze in; I don't > think this is particularly urgent, and it's late to the party.
Do we want this patch for 9.5? It throws an error for invalid reloption specifications. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
