On 15 July 2014 19:15, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Where was the discussion of > why this change should be back-patched?
Your question has broader implications. Currently commit messages do not reference the conversations that led to them and a great many use entirely different descriptions on-list and in the commit message, nor are entries added to conversations to reflect commits. I share your pain in not being able to follow or remember what led to many of them. In fact, I'm pretty sure more than a few commits have no public discussion at all, though mostly there is good discussion. I'm happy to follow any agreed process we lay out. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
