On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This seems to make sense. Barring objection, I will commit this >> only in HEAD.
Committed. > I'm inclined to think this is a slight improvement, just for the > sake of consistency with peer level information. You probably > already noticed, but the patch as submitted neglects to close the > prior sect2 block before opening the new one. Yes, thanks for pointing out that! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
