2014-06-30 8:17 GMT+02:00 Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rast...@huawei.com>:

>  On 26 June 2014 11:53, Samrat Revagade Wrote:
>
>
>
> >> I am sending updated patch - buggy statement is printed via more
> logical psql_error function instead printf
>
>
>
> >Thank you for updating patch, I really appreciate your efforts.
>
>
>
> >Now, everything is good from my side.
>
> >* it apply cleanly to the current git master
>
> >* includes necessary docs
>
> >* I think It is very good  and necessary feature.
>
>
>
> >If Kumar Rajeev Rastogi do not have any extra comments, then I
> think patch is  ready for committer.
>
>
>
> I have reviewed this patch. Please find my review comments below:
>
> 1.     Command start-up option (e.g. -a/--echo-all for --ECHO=all), for
> new functionality is not provided.
>
all not options entered via psql variables has psql option and psql
comment. I'll plan add new decription to --help-variables list.

If it is necessary I can add long option --echo-errors, I didn't a good
char for short option. Any idea?




>  2.     New Command start-up option should be added in "psql --help" as
> well as in documentation.
>
depends on previous,



>
>
> Also as I understand, this new option is kind of sub-set of existing
> option (ECHO=query), so should not we display
>
> query string in the same format as it was getting printed earlier.
>
> Though I also feel that prefixing query with STATEMENT word will be
> helpful to grep but at the same time I am worried
>
> about inconsistency with existing option.
>

This is question. And I am not strong in feeling what should be preferred.
But still I am inclined to prefer a variant with STATEMENT prefix. Mode
with -a is used with different purpose than mode "show errors only" - and
output with prefix is much more consistent with log entry - and displaying
error. So I agree, so there is potential inconsistency (but nowhere is
output defined), but this output is more practical, when you are
concentrated to error's processing.

Regards

Pavel


>
>
> *Thanks and Regards,*
>
> *Kumar Rajeev Rastogi *
>

Reply via email to