Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > I didn't add this patch to the commitfest, because it was just a point > for discussion and not actually proposed for application. But It > doesn't seem to have provoked much discussion either.
> Should I go add this to the next commitfest? > I do see it listed as a resolved item in > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.4_Open_Items > But I can't find a commit that would resolve it, so does that mean the > resolution was that the behavior was not new in 9.4 and so didn't need > to be fixed for it? It looks to me like Robert added that item to the "open items" page, but he put it at the bottom --- ie in the "already resolved items" list: https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_9.4_Open_Items&diff=22417&oldid=22380 Probably this was a mistake and it should have gone into the still-to-do list. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
