On 2014-06-23 13:33:46 +0200, Vik Fearing wrote: > On 06/22/2014 07:47 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2014-06-22 09:27:24 -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote: > >> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > but I don't like that much. Not sure what'd be good, the best I > > currently can come up with is: > > idle_in_transaction_termination_timeout = > > idle_in_transaction_cancellation_timeout = > > Except the transaction wouldn't be cancelled, it would be aborted.
That ship has sailed with pg_cancel_backend(), no? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
