Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 16:17, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I prefer GUC variables to table entries for setting stuff like recursion > >> limits; they're much lighter-weight to create and access, and you don't > >> need an initdb to add or remove a parameter. > > > I don't see an adequate way to store the individual settings as GUC > > variables per user... > > Have you looked at the per-database and per-user GUC facilities in 7.3?
Nice idea. You can now have per-user/db settings that are SET when the connection is made. You can set any GUC variable that way. We just need a variable that can look at all sessions and determine if that user has exceeded their connection quota. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly