Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:12:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> What about comparing to the symbolic value LOBLKSIZE? This would make >>> pg_upgrade assume that the old installation had been tweaked the same >>> as in its own build. This ends up being the same as what you said, >>> ie, effectively no comparison ... but it might be less complicated to >>> code/understand.
>> OK, assume the compiled-in default is the value for an old cluster that >> has no value --- yeah, I could do that. > I'm not really sure why this is better than Bruce's original proposal, though. The net behavior would be the same, but I thought it might be easier to code by thinking of it this way. Or maybe it wouldn't --- it's just a suggestion. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers